WHINE # 36 – October, 2012
Welcome Gary Doucette of Antigonish, Carolyn McFarlane of
Halifax, and Al Pressey of Winnipeg to the Whine. I am also very pleased to have Al as a guest blogger. I hope this is not they only time that he
agrees to contribute to the Whine.
I first met Dr.
Pressey in 1968 when he was a young Professor and I was just starting my
Ph.D. I have very fond memories of that
time when, as a Maritimer, I was
introduced by Al to the vibrancy and culture of the Canadian Prairies. However, before we get to Al’s article, let
me first describe what I now call the 100-mile restaurant.
Dining in the “back of the beyond”: In late August Betty was surfing
the net, looking for a place to stay near the Aroostock Valley Golf and Country
Club (which straddles the New Brunswick/Maine border.) She happened upon the Canterbury Royale
Gourmet Dining Room, which is in Fort Fairfield, Maine. For those of you who have never been to
Fort Fairfield I can honestly say that it is so far into the back woods that it
makes Antigonish seem like the centre of the universe.
The website indicated that meals were a fixed price and always
included 7 courses. E-mailing for a
reservation she was told that we had to select our entrées a minimum of 7 days in advance and that the
other six courses were selected by the Chefs.
This was because most meats had to be flown in from New York City,
although we learned later that the duck breast came directly from France.
Hoping for the best we ate little (a wise decision) on the
appointed day and simply chased golf balls around the Presque Isle Country
Club. After a leisurely cocktail we
drove though Fort Fairfield and entered the deep forest, relying entirely on
our trusty GPS. Eventually we turned
into a parking space next to a modest building.
The sign on the door read “Welcome Johnsons”.
We were ushered into one of the two rooms, each having only
one table. Ours was beautifully set with
very fine china and enough silverware to arm a small band of
revolutionaries. I ordered an excellent
Cabernet from Napa and our dining experience was about to begin.
We were first presented with loaves of Challah bread and
onion bread. It was next to impossible
not to satiate ourselves but we did manage to leave a few crusts. Next came something called Consomme Olga,
which had a huge and delightfully fresh Bay of Fundy scallop in the centre. This was followed by a green salad (see
picture) served with a brandy and brown sugar dressing.
Our next course was French duck breast braised in morel
mushrooms and paired with a bread pudding.
This was followed by a tiny filet mignon that had been perfectly cooked
in a reduction of Chateauneuf-du-Pape and Cognac. This was served with Potatoes Dauphine and
Artichokes.
For the main course Betty had Seafood Crepes and I had
lobster sauted in Cognac. Although I
wouldn’t have traded my lobster her crepes were rolled in a rose shape and were
clearly a work of art. Her lobster,
shrimp and scallops were in a side sauce and the rose-shaped shells contained
grapes, poached peaches and watermelon.
The decadent desserts were not a disappointment and we
enjoyed a coffee before driving back through the forest to our hotel.
Canterbury Royale is owned and operated by two women who
were New York chefs before making the dramatic move to northern Maine.
Why do I call this the 100-mile restaurant? That’s because if you are ever in Maine it’s
worth a 100-mile side trip. And, for the
curious the meal cost us $ 168, including the wine. (that’s 164 Loonies at the
current rate of exchange).
Al Pressey’s “Nectar
of the Gods”
I was born in the final days
of the Great Depression. Attitudes that
were formed during that unfortunate decade lingered for a long time. One sentiment that persisted was that money
was scarce and was not to be wasted especially on those things that could be
made at home. Although it was not true
at our place, many still carded their own wool, made yarn and knitted socks and
sweaters. A rare few even made their own
soap. So it is not surprising that making
one’s own whiskey was simply another act of self-sufficiency. Indeed, to waste precious money on a luxury
was considered to be irresponsible. The
only reason that some gave it a second thought was that it was illegal. Our region was considered to be “unorganized
territory” but there were two law enforcement agents. One was a game warden and the other an RCMP
officer. This meant that virtually every farmstead had a secret cache where
deer meat and home brew were stored.
Because no one in our family was a big game hunter, any deer meat that
we had was a gift and I knew exactly in which well it was hidden. Whiskey was another matter. Whenever a special guest appeared or when the
local priest came for dinner, mother would disappear, and several minutes
later, reappear with a pristine bottle of white liquid that was well above the
80 proof that was advertised by commercial products. I knew that the hiding
place was not underground and that it had to be nearby but the sacred spot was
never discussed and never revealed.
I was
the youngest in our family and one of the perks was being allowed to sleep in
the warmest bedroom during the winter.
But there was one drawback associated with that good fortune. I had to share the space with a crock of mash
and the ensuing odor that heralded the first phase of brewing.
Twice a
year, a 10-gallon clay crock was placed on a chair beside the hot air
radiator. Into it were added sliced
potatoes, wheat, raisins, sugar, yeast and water. I do not recall what else glorified the
concoction but once I believe I saw orange slices floating atop the fermenting
mass. Such subtle inclusions would not
be surprising since communal reputations were at stake.
Distillation
was a genius of simplicity. The only
apparatus required was a canner (with cover) and a small home crafted
four-legged stool. The canner would be
placed over low heat and filled with about 5 inches of mash. The stool would be centered so that it held a
small basin just above the surface. The
canner would then be covered with an inverted lid that was sealed at the rim
with a wet cloth. Ice, snow or just cold
water was poured into the inverted lid so that the steam from the mash was
converted into liquid that flowed to the center of the lid and dripped into the
basin.
The
most exciting part of the process was the test for purity. Mother would extract a teaspoonful of the
liquid, strike a wooden match, and try to light the distillate. Successful ignition indicated a successful
product but the best part occurred when she tossed the flaming liquid into the
wood box. It would burn on top of the
logs without ever setting them on fire.
I never tired of watching flambeed fire logs but this experience did
nothing to enhance any future appreciation for such exotica.
The
white elixir was known by many names including “home brew”, “white lightening”,
and “porch climber” but in our household such phrases were considered demeaning
probably because the drink was intimately tied to religious holidays such as
Christmas, Easter, and, of course, the joining of husband and wife in holy
matrimony. So, it was just called
“whiskey” and was used in much the same way that other cultures used champagne.
I do
not recall my father ever being involved in actually distilling the
product. I suspect that it was because
he sought to squeeze too much out of the mash thus imbuing the extract with too
harsh a taste. To produce a proper
result required the exact balance of heat, length of simmer and many other
variables, the entirety of which probably existed as an intuitive “feel” in the
mind if the maker. It is, as I understand it, much like making perfect
“borscht”. Outlining the ingredients and
the steps in a recipe does not guarantee an exquisite creation. And, an exquisite creation was indeed the aim
of every man and woman in the community.
I recall an occasion when Christmas carolers came and, after their
performance, were offered the obligatory shot glass of liquor. My cousin Tony declared, “Auntie, you are a
genuine artist!” Perhaps I am making
this up, but there seemed to be a renewed bounce in my mother’s step for
several weeks after.
Humans
were not the only species that experienced the rewards of the nectar of the
gods. One morning I stepped outside the
house and saw an astonishing and alarming sight. There, in the yard lying on the ground, were
several dozen Barred Rock and White Leghorn chickens. They were all dead! Fearing a lethal attack (of chicken pox,
perhaps), I called out for help but there seemed to be no one around.
Finally, gathering some courage, I cautiously approached the
nearest carcass and gently tapped it with my shoe. “ Poot-poo duck; poot-poo duck” cackled the
suddenly enervated corpse as it struggled to its feet. But walk it could not. It spread its wings like two canes and tried
to propel itself forward. Then, emitting
its deranged cackle, it collapsed in a heap once more. Relief engulfed me as I realized that the
chickens were not dead. But the puzzle remained until I noticed the scattered
remains of puffed wheat, bloated raisins and slices of potato. Then it struck me; the hens were as drunk as
the proverbial skunk!
On
occasion, my wife asks me how I would like my chicken prepared for supper. When I reply “pickled”, she rolls her eyes
having tired of the joke long ago.
Aging wine in oak barrels:
Wine which is aged in oak barrels undergoes significant
change. Firstly, the oak adds flavour to
the wine. The aroma of an oaked wine is
best described as that of cloves or vanilla.
Secondly, the wine takes on some of the oaks tannins, giving the wine a
more astringent feel in the mouth.
Thirdly, the porous oak allows evaporation which makes the remaining
wine more concentrated, so that it seems fuller and more robust.
Sixty gallon oak barrels are expensive, each costing more
than $ 1,000. A good vintner will only
use a barrel 3 times (then perhaps selling the barrel to those making lesser
wines) as there is, at that point, little flavor to impart to the wine. In addition, the evaporation of up to 10% of
the wine adds additional cost. A
barrel-aged wine is going to cost the consumer several dollars more than the
same wine aged in stainless steel. The
good news is that vintners only oak wines made from their better grapes. This means that when you read on a label that
the wine was aged (usually between 6 and 18 months, but more for a Spanish Gran
Reserva) in oak you know that this is most likely going to be a good wine.
On caution, however, is that in order to save money oak
chips are sometimes added to wine aging in stainless steel. While this adds a bit of flavour there is no
effect on the critical evaporation process.
My advice is to leave on the shelf wines that are simply described as
oaked, searching instead for the key phrase “aged for so many months in
American and/or French oak”.
Not all wines benefit from aging in oak. Of the reds Cabernet Sauvignon is most
frequently oaked. In fact, I have never
had an unoaked Cabernet that was worth drinking. Merlots and Malbecs also benefit from
oaking.
White wines, in particular Chardonnay, are sometimes
oaked. The effect of oaking a Chardonnay
is so dramatic that it doesn’t appear to be from the same grape as an unoaked
Chardonnay. Without oak a Chardonnay has
a crisp taste reminding one of limes or green apples. Heavily oaked Chardonnay becomes rich and
buttery tasting. In fact so many
consumers react negatively to the buttery taste of well-oaked California
Chardonnays that vintners more and more often put the word “unoaked” prominently
on the label. I should point out to
those of us who like are freshly boiled lobsters dipped in melted butter that
an oaked Chardonnay is a very good match.
Finally, there is a health benefit to oaking wine. We all know that wine contain potent antioxidants
that benefit the heart, lungs, blood pressure and even skin tone. The most important antioxidant is reservatrol
which prevents damage to skin cells through aging and even prevents
post-menopausal bone density loss, and may reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s. This is not even mentioning that reservatrol
helps kill cancer cells. Oak-aged wines are higher in antioxidants
than other wines. Thus paying an extra
few dollars for wines aged in oak barrels doesn’t bother me at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment